GPGSL S11: R14 Flevoland GP [VACANCIES, join now!!! || R13 QUAL online p.157, RACE p.158!!!]
Posted by GPGSL
NickJW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @shep34 im dutch not danish
Noted, along with all other points raised
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
-------------------------------------------------------
> @shep34 im dutch not danish
Noted, along with all other points raised
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
i like the snake tyres design, and i see no problem with it at all.
i mean, looking from "roleplay" point of view - snake motorsports created various types of chassis everyone's using since eternity, so it should be no problem for such kind of giant monopolist manufacturer to develop their own engine and tyres
---thinking out loud---
it might be a different story if tyres played a bigger role (rather than decorative), like making any difference on team/drivers perfomance. me and my brother were running our own private fictional series since 2001, where every team had budgets to choose from the different drivers, tyres, engines, chissis, fuel, brakes, electronics etc etc and each option played a role on calculating the perfomance file. so every team had to choose either to sign 2 good (yet expensive) drivers, but have less money to spend on decent engines, tyres and everything else, or you could save money with signing a cheap driver for a 2nd seat maybe, to have some extra cash to make a better car for the main driver, and so on. the sponsors also played an impact, it was an optional thing tho. the bigger sponsors pack your team had - the more money you gained from winning the race/scoring the points. singning a sponsor also costed some money, so it was a risky thing, because if you wasted the money to sign a sponsor instead of signing a better engine for example, you risked to remain out of the points with a slower car, but if you was lucky to get some points with the largely sponsored car, your team earned some extra cash, which you could spend to sign a better engine for the next season, or for the next race even. there were also transportation expenses, so it was sometimes a trouble for the poorer teams to make their voyage to the american or asian/australian events. it was a huge fun, each season some teams were running out of money because of bad strategy, and some others remained flourishing and competative through all the 11 seasons we played (and btw michael soutsen is the name of one of the drivers from that series too, that's where from it originates
). i think you could implement something like this for s12 maybe, to make a bigger impact on team ownership, and to make the team rotation even smoother with some of them naturally running out of money because of the constant lack of pace through the consecutive seasons (speaking of snake motorports by the way...)
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
i mean, looking from "roleplay" point of view - snake motorsports created various types of chassis everyone's using since eternity, so it should be no problem for such kind of giant monopolist manufacturer to develop their own engine and tyres
---thinking out loud---
it might be a different story if tyres played a bigger role (rather than decorative), like making any difference on team/drivers perfomance. me and my brother were running our own private fictional series since 2001, where every team had budgets to choose from the different drivers, tyres, engines, chissis, fuel, brakes, electronics etc etc and each option played a role on calculating the perfomance file. so every team had to choose either to sign 2 good (yet expensive) drivers, but have less money to spend on decent engines, tyres and everything else, or you could save money with signing a cheap driver for a 2nd seat maybe, to have some extra cash to make a better car for the main driver, and so on. the sponsors also played an impact, it was an optional thing tho. the bigger sponsors pack your team had - the more money you gained from winning the race/scoring the points. singning a sponsor also costed some money, so it was a risky thing, because if you wasted the money to sign a sponsor instead of signing a better engine for example, you risked to remain out of the points with a slower car, but if you was lucky to get some points with the largely sponsored car, your team earned some extra cash, which you could spend to sign a better engine for the next season, or for the next race even. there were also transportation expenses, so it was sometimes a trouble for the poorer teams to make their voyage to the american or asian/australian events. it was a huge fun, each season some teams were running out of money because of bad strategy, and some others remained flourishing and competative through all the 11 seasons we played (and btw michael soutsen is the name of one of the drivers from that series too, that's where from it originates
). i think you could implement something like this for s12 maybe, to make a bigger impact on team ownership, and to make the team rotation even smoother with some of them naturally running out of money because of the constant lack of pace through the consecutive seasons (speaking of snake motorports by the way...) ___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Soutsen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i like the snake tyres design, and i see no
> problem with it at all.
> i mean, looking from "roleplay" point of view -
> snake motorsports created various types of chassis
> everyone's using since eternity, so it should be
> no problem for such kind of giant monopolist
> manufacturer to develop their own engine and tyres
> [www.grandprixgames.org]
> if
>
> ---thinking out loud---
>
> it might be a different story if tyres played a
> bigger role (rather than decorative), like making
> any difference on team/drivers perfomance. me and
> my brother were running our own private fictional
> series since 2001, where every team had budgets to
> choose from the different drivers, tyres, engines,
> chissis, fuel, brakes, electronics etc etc and
> each option played a role on calculating the
> perfomance file. so every team had to choose
> either to sign 2 good (yet expensive) drivers, but
> have less money to spend on decent engines, tyres
> and everything else, or you could save money with
> signing a cheap driver for a 2nd seat maybe, to
> have some extra cash to make a better car for the
> main driver, and so on. the sponsors also played
> an impact, it was an optional thing tho. the
> bigger sponsors pack your team had - the more
> money you gained from winning the race/scoring the
> points. singning a sponsor also costed some money,
> so it was a risky thing, because if you wasted the
> money to sign a sponsor instead of signing a
> better engine for example, you risked to remain
> out of the points with a slower car, but if you
> was lucky to get some points with the largely
> sponsored car, your team earned some extra cash,
> which you could spend to sign a better engine for
> the next season, or for the next race even. there
> were also transportation expenses, so it was
> sometimes a trouble for the poorer teams to make
> their voyage to the american or asian/australian
> events. it was a huge fun, each season some teams
> were running out of money because of bad strategy,
> and some others remained flourishing and
> competative through all the 11 seasons we played
> (and btw michael soutsen is the name of one of the
> drivers from that series too, that's where from it
> originates). i think you could implement
> something like this for s12 maybe, to make a
> bigger impact on team ownership, and to make the
> team rotation even smoother with some of them
> naturally running out of money because of the
> constant lack of pace through the consecutive
> seasons (speaking of snake motorports by the
> way...)
Nope. Too complicated. Best to K.I.S.S - Keep It Simple Stupid!
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
-------------------------------------------------------
> i like the snake tyres design, and i see no
> problem with it at all.
> i mean, looking from "roleplay" point of view -
> snake motorsports created various types of chassis
> everyone's using since eternity, so it should be
> no problem for such kind of giant monopolist
> manufacturer to develop their own engine and tyres
> [www.grandprixgames.org]
> if
>
> ---thinking out loud---
>
> it might be a different story if tyres played a
> bigger role (rather than decorative), like making
> any difference on team/drivers perfomance. me and
> my brother were running our own private fictional
> series since 2001, where every team had budgets to
> choose from the different drivers, tyres, engines,
> chissis, fuel, brakes, electronics etc etc and
> each option played a role on calculating the
> perfomance file. so every team had to choose
> either to sign 2 good (yet expensive) drivers, but
> have less money to spend on decent engines, tyres
> and everything else, or you could save money with
> signing a cheap driver for a 2nd seat maybe, to
> have some extra cash to make a better car for the
> main driver, and so on. the sponsors also played
> an impact, it was an optional thing tho. the
> bigger sponsors pack your team had - the more
> money you gained from winning the race/scoring the
> points. singning a sponsor also costed some money,
> so it was a risky thing, because if you wasted the
> money to sign a sponsor instead of signing a
> better engine for example, you risked to remain
> out of the points with a slower car, but if you
> was lucky to get some points with the largely
> sponsored car, your team earned some extra cash,
> which you could spend to sign a better engine for
> the next season, or for the next race even. there
> were also transportation expenses, so it was
> sometimes a trouble for the poorer teams to make
> their voyage to the american or asian/australian
> events. it was a huge fun, each season some teams
> were running out of money because of bad strategy,
> and some others remained flourishing and
> competative through all the 11 seasons we played
> (and btw michael soutsen is the name of one of the
> drivers from that series too, that's where from it
> originates
). i think you could implement> something like this for s12 maybe, to make a
> bigger impact on team ownership, and to make the
> team rotation even smoother with some of them
> naturally running out of money because of the
> constant lack of pace through the consecutive
> seasons (speaking of snake motorports by the
> way...)
Nope. Too complicated. Best to K.I.S.S - Keep It Simple Stupid!
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
Some revisions of the drivers/nationalities etc.... Feel free to advise any further changes needed!
And unless i have missed the announcements, 1 spare test seat at SCR and 2 spare test seats at MPR yet to be announced.....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
And unless i have missed the announcements, 1 spare test seat at SCR and 2 spare test seats at MPR yet to be announced.....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
It's Sean O'Neill and Alpha Motorsports
What happened to the flags, the look rather bad?
I seem to remember Greg mentioned something about Joshua no longer being around?
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2017 12:10PM by kedy89.
What happened to the flags, the look rather bad?
I seem to remember Greg mentioned something about Joshua no longer being around?
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2017 12:10PM by kedy89.
kedy89 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's Sean O'Neill and Alpha Motorsports
>
> What happened to the flags, the look rather bad?
O'Neill spelling corrected, and Alpha Motorsports returned as team name....
I thought the same with the flags! Not sure if they have somehow been corrupted, in the transition between spreadsheets - they look perfect in the main reference spreadsheet, but crap on the results sheets?? Will work on this over the weekend....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's Sean O'Neill and Alpha Motorsports
>
> What happened to the flags, the look rather bad?
O'Neill spelling corrected, and Alpha Motorsports returned as team name....
I thought the same with the flags! Not sure if they have somehow been corrupted, in the transition between spreadsheets - they look perfect in the main reference spreadsheet, but crap on the results sheets?? Will work on this over the weekend....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
shep34 schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought the same with the flags! Not sure if
> they have somehow been corrupted, in the
> transition between spreadsheets - they look
> perfect in the main reference spreadsheet, but
> crap on the results sheets?? Will work on this
> over the weekend....
Quite strange, since the flags on the results etc. sheets are just screenshots of the ones on the reference sheet :/
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought the same with the flags! Not sure if
> they have somehow been corrupted, in the
> transition between spreadsheets - they look
> perfect in the main reference spreadsheet, but
> crap on the results sheets?? Will work on this
> over the weekend....
Quite strange, since the flags on the results etc. sheets are just screenshots of the ones on the reference sheet :/
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
kedy89 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> shep34 schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I thought the same with the flags! Not sure if
> > they have somehow been corrupted, in the
> > transition between spreadsheets - they look
> > perfect in the main reference spreadsheet, but
> > crap on the results sheets?? Will work on this
> > over the weekend....
>
>
> Quite strange, since the flags on the results etc.
> sheets are just screenshots of the ones on the
> reference sheet :/
Hmmm, very odd - opened up the backup copy, and the flags appear fine in the results table - will be reverting to that copy me thinks.....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
-------------------------------------------------------
> shep34 schrieb:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I thought the same with the flags! Not sure if
> > they have somehow been corrupted, in the
> > transition between spreadsheets - they look
> > perfect in the main reference spreadsheet, but
> > crap on the results sheets?? Will work on this
> > over the weekend....
>
>
> Quite strange, since the flags on the results etc.
> sheets are just screenshots of the ones on the
> reference sheet :/
Hmmm, very odd - opened up the backup copy, and the flags appear fine in the results table - will be reverting to that copy me thinks.....
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
Version of Excel are you using @shep34? Think it does that with the flags when using a version older than 2013 (have same problem with the tables in Nations Cup. Have to delete the flag and copy/paste from the flags tab to make it look cleaner)
As for Joshua, I've decided to give him till the end of Rd 1 before I make the decision to replace him. After all, until the season is officially underway and a deadline set for the first activity check, the participants don't really have to be active while it's in the off-season/pre-season (and I think this applies to everyone else who hasn't made any posts since the end of Season 10).
As for Joshua, I've decided to give him till the end of Rd 1 before I make the decision to replace him. After all, until the season is officially underway and a deadline set for the first activity check, the participants don't really have to be active while it's in the off-season/pre-season (and I think this applies to everyone else who hasn't made any posts since the end of Season 10).
Mullet345 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Version of Excel are you using @shep34? Think it
> does that with the flags when using a version
> older than 2013
Jeepers! This Excel version on my home desktop is 2007!!!! Never realised it was that old! LOL! Might have to see if i can somehow copy my version off the laptop, onto the desktop......
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Version of Excel are you using @shep34? Think it
> does that with the flags when using a version
> older than 2013
Jeepers! This Excel version on my home desktop is 2007!!!! Never realised it was that old! LOL! Might have to see if i can somehow copy my version off the laptop, onto the desktop......
GPGSL Team Owner Debut - Melbourne, Season 8 - present
GPGSL Test Debut - Hungary, Season 4. GPGSL Race Debut - Adelaide, Season 5.
shep34 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nope. Too complicated. Best to K.I.S.S - Keep It
> Simple Stupid!
i agree with that K.I.S.S concept, but right now reading that big wall of text about the current perfs generation on the first page is like reading the egyptian hieroglyphs for me
speaking of that, i might be the only one, who don't really like the idea of perfomance "equalization"? it seems to me that for the newcomers the testing duties is the thing that should make a greater impact on gaining the performance points, so they should spend at least a half of a season (or full season even) on friday tests instead of rushing for a race seat and be somehow competative from the start just because of forced equalization...
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2017 12:44PM by Soutsen.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nope. Too complicated. Best to K.I.S.S - Keep It
> Simple Stupid!
i agree with that K.I.S.S concept, but right now reading that big wall of text about the current perfs generation on the first page is like reading the egyptian hieroglyphs for me
speaking of that, i might be the only one, who don't really like the idea of perfomance "equalization"? it seems to me that for the newcomers the testing duties is the thing that should make a greater impact on gaining the performance points, so they should spend at least a half of a season (or full season even) on friday tests instead of rushing for a race seat and be somehow competative from the start just because of forced equalization...
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2017 12:44PM by Soutsen.
shep34 schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mullet345 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Version of Excel are you using @shep34? Think
> it
> > does that with the flags when using a version
> > older than 2013
>
> Jeepers! This Excel version on my home desktop is
> 2007!!!! Never realised it was that old! LOL!
> Might have to see if i can somehow copy my version
> off the laptop, onto the desktop......
2007 might give issues with the standings, as far as I can remember it only supported 3 rules for conditional formatting. I created the sheets with 2010, with which they still worked perfectly fine yesterday.
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mullet345 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Version of Excel are you using @shep34? Think
> it
> > does that with the flags when using a version
> > older than 2013
>
> Jeepers! This Excel version on my home desktop is
> 2007!!!! Never realised it was that old! LOL!
> Might have to see if i can somehow copy my version
> off the laptop, onto the desktop......
2007 might give issues with the standings, as far as I can remember it only supported 3 rules for conditional formatting. I created the sheets with 2010, with which they still worked perfectly fine yesterday.
Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018
It's because of the dynamics of GP4. A few seasons ago we had the situation that the older the driver (aka the longer he/she participated in the series), the better the position because of their high performance, they only increased their performance gaps to test drivers instead of them catching up over time, since there was no boundary. Compare it to a real driver. At some stage, they have earned enough experience that they won't make big performance gaps any longer. From then on it's just fine tuning. And since we never got to implement a rule that a driver only has the peak for a couple of seasons before they grow too old, we went with 'levelling' the starter perfs. It's no 'equalization' anyway, because the best driver still has 45 points more than a newcomer. Before, some people complained that always the same driver/team combinations were winning. Now some other people complain that newcomers have a chance to win. How you do it, you do it wrong. But this is the situation that we'll stick to for now, because it gives every driver a realistic chance while still lightly favouring (and honoring the effort of) long time drivers.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
JohnMaverick Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I really don't see what the one has to do with the
> other. Except that, Snake is a 'real' 'virtual'
> brand with a year's long history. And to top this
> all, if we take it seriously, using real sponsors
> etc. we actually perform copyright infringements
> over and over. Shall I continue? How about
> re-branding? Have you ever seen an engine built by
> TAG-Heuer? Like it or not but if Snake decides to
> 'build' tyres and use them, it's their decision.
I think we all should do like Maikel does with his Snake Motorsport Team, maybe for next season... just a thought
+1
GPGSL-3: VTR Driver, S4~S11 (2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3th, 4th, 3th, 2nd)(Constructorstitel S7 & S9)
GPGSL-4: ONE Racing Driver, S8~S11 // TYRANT Racing Driver, S12:1st, S13:13th, S14:1st, S15:13th //
WREXHAM Motorsports Racing Driver S16: ?
-------------------------------------------------------
> I really don't see what the one has to do with the
> other. Except that, Snake is a 'real' 'virtual'
> brand with a year's long history. And to top this
> all, if we take it seriously, using real sponsors
> etc. we actually perform copyright infringements
> over and over. Shall I continue? How about
> re-branding? Have you ever seen an engine built by
> TAG-Heuer? Like it or not but if Snake decides to
> 'build' tyres and use them, it's their decision.
I think we all should do like Maikel does with his Snake Motorsport Team, maybe for next season... just a thought
+1
GPGSL-3: VTR Driver, S4~S11 (2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3th, 4th, 3th, 2nd)(Constructorstitel S7 & S9)
GPGSL-4: ONE Racing Driver, S8~S11 // TYRANT Racing Driver, S12:1st, S13:13th, S14:1st, S15:13th //
WREXHAM Motorsports Racing Driver S16: ?
I'm honestly considering a swap to Snake tyres for S12
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
JohnMaverick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...this is the situation that we'll stick to for now...
that's fine, i don't have too much experience with running pure AI races, because in our series we were driving all the 22 cars one by one via hot-seat option with my brother, and it was a completely different experience. GP4 AI car tends to run fast even after switching hot seat if you ran fast enough with that particular car, and vise versa - if you were slow/made mistakes, the AI driver will drive relatively slower as well untill his next hot-seat segment. so we used to have a much wider difference in values in the perf file to make its impact more visible.
but what about 500 range value, which is the same for every driver? with the current 45 points between the best and the lowest driver performance values, as you mentioned, isn't it make the results almost absolutely random? maybe i don't properly understand how the range value works with the AI races... anyone could explain? and what about making a range value boosts as well, or something like that, to make a make a bigger impact for drivers to affect their performances even further
and did you swap your helmet from black to green one for the coming season? i really like it, though i think Tobi might have said that gillette logos should be colored (or at least outlined) with black
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2017 02:18PM by Soutsen.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...this is the situation that we'll stick to for now...
that's fine, i don't have too much experience with running pure AI races, because in our series we were driving all the 22 cars one by one via hot-seat option with my brother, and it was a completely different experience. GP4 AI car tends to run fast even after switching hot seat if you ran fast enough with that particular car, and vise versa - if you were slow/made mistakes, the AI driver will drive relatively slower as well untill his next hot-seat segment. so we used to have a much wider difference in values in the perf file to make its impact more visible.
but what about 500 range value, which is the same for every driver? with the current 45 points between the best and the lowest driver performance values, as you mentioned, isn't it make the results almost absolutely random? maybe i don't properly understand how the range value works with the AI races... anyone could explain? and what about making a range value boosts as well, or something like that, to make a make a bigger impact for drivers to affect their performances even further
and did you swap your helmet from black to green one for the coming season? i really like it, though i think Tobi might have said that gillette logos should be colored (or at least outlined) with black
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2017 02:18PM by Soutsen.
Soutsen schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> but what about 500 range value, which is the same
> for every driver? with the current 45 points
> between the best and the lowest driver performance
> values, as you mentioned, isn't it make the
> results almost absolutely random? maybe i don't
> properly understand how the range value works with
> the AI races... anyone could explain? and what
> about making a range value boosts as well, or
> something like that, to make a make a bigger
> impact for drivers to affect their performances
> even further
>
There is a factor of randomness in it and that is by purpose. However, we said there is going to be a boost system change for this season and it's likely that this will incorporate said value, too. But we neither want the strongest drivers always on top of the field nor a boost leading to a certain podium finish.
> and did you swap your helmet from black to green
> one for the coming season? i really like it,
> though i think Tobi might have said that gillette
> logos should be colored (or at least outlined)
> with black
The version I sent in to Stu is a black one. For the render I caught the wrong file and rendered it in blue/green and haven't had the time, yet, to make new renders.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
-------------------------------------------------------
> but what about 500 range value, which is the same
> for every driver? with the current 45 points
> between the best and the lowest driver performance
> values, as you mentioned, isn't it make the
> results almost absolutely random? maybe i don't
> properly understand how the range value works with
> the AI races... anyone could explain? and what
> about making a range value boosts as well, or
> something like that, to make a make a bigger
> impact for drivers to affect their performances
> even further
>
There is a factor of randomness in it and that is by purpose. However, we said there is going to be a boost system change for this season and it's likely that this will incorporate said value, too. But we neither want the strongest drivers always on top of the field nor a boost leading to a certain podium finish.
> and did you swap your helmet from black to green
> one for the coming season? i really like it,
> though i think Tobi might have said that gillette
> logos should be colored (or at least outlined)
> with black
The version I sent in to Stu is a black one. For the render I caught the wrong file and rendered it in blue/green and haven't had the time, yet, to make new renders.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
Will new teams all receive the same Team Boost BHP level for the season, or still receive different amounts based on which team is nominally 9th 10th and 11th for example.
X (@ed24f1)
X (@ed24f1)
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.