GPGSL S11: R14 Flevoland GP [VACANCIES, join now!!! || R13 QUAL online p.157, RACE p.158!!!]
Posted by GPGSL
kedy89 schrieb:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ahh got it now, so only race counts then, i.e. 30
> (GIL) + 17 (WOR) + 1 (FL). Cheers for the
> explanation
Exactly that.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ahh got it now, so only race counts then, i.e. 30
> (GIL) + 17 (WOR) + 1 (FL). Cheers for the
> explanation
Exactly that.
GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)
Thanks a lot! That additional point is what was making a difference. I will make quick fix to my formulas. Cheers!
Btw, still if you consider the "extra points" then our MTP team should've been 788,808 instead of 787, 807 at Sepang, because
20 (SCA) + 15 (ANC) +1 (PG-Scala) = 36
36/12 = 3
780+3, 800+3 = 783, 803
783, 803 + 5 boost points = 788, 808
Another mistake? Or you just don't consider PG points as extra ones? I'm a little bit confused with this >.<
p.s. and on a totally unrelated note, we had MPR received their 1st warning for inactivity of mr. Dan Paddock before the race at Sepang. Isn't it means they should have been fined with -10 points (I've read it from the rules
)? Because looking at the official results page after Sepang I still see only the 9 points they have scored, and no penalty applied. It's time to inforce the law! 
...maybe >.< ofc i'm not sure if this rule is still a thing anymore c:
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/26/2017 05:08PM by Soutsen.
Btw, still if you consider the "extra points" then our MTP team should've been 788,808 instead of 787, 807 at Sepang, because
20 (SCA) + 15 (ANC) +1 (PG-Scala) = 36
36/12 = 3
780+3, 800+3 = 783, 803
783, 803 + 5 boost points = 788, 808
Another mistake? Or you just don't consider PG points as extra ones? I'm a little bit confused with this >.<
p.s. and on a totally unrelated note, we had MPR received their 1st warning for inactivity of mr. Dan Paddock before the race at Sepang. Isn't it means they should have been fined with -10 points (I've read it from the rules
)? Because looking at the official results page after Sepang I still see only the 9 points they have scored, and no penalty applied. It's time to inforce the law! ...maybe >.< ofc i'm not sure if this rule is still a thing anymore c:___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/26/2017 05:08PM by Soutsen.
I'm only a driver, I don't do maths or perf calculations...
... let's go to Monza, plsssss !
GPGSL-3: VTR Driver, S4~S11 (2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3th, 4th, 3th, 2nd)(Constructorstitel S7 & S9)
GPGSL-4: ONE Racing Driver, S8~S11 // TYRANT Racing Driver, S12:1st, S13:13th, S14:1st, S15:13th //
WREXHAM Motorsports Racing Driver S16: ?
... let's go to Monza, plsssss !
GPGSL-3: VTR Driver, S4~S11 (2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3th, 4th, 3th, 2nd)(Constructorstitel S7 & S9)
GPGSL-4: ONE Racing Driver, S8~S11 // TYRANT Racing Driver, S12:1st, S13:13th, S14:1st, S15:13th //
WREXHAM Motorsports Racing Driver S16: ?
Actually there was a big bug in the previous version of my testers perf building tool, which was preventing it from calculating results for race perfs after R5. Now it is fixed, and the driver caps implemented as well
This version should be correct [www35.zippyshare.com]
The racers/bhp version is ready with the drivers/engine power caps added too. All I need to know is if PG should be taken into account for bhp calculations, or not.
sorry for uploading a bugged version of the testers perf builder yesteday >.<
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
This version should be correct [www35.zippyshare.com]
The racers/bhp version is ready with the drivers/engine power caps added too. All I need to know is if PG should be taken into account for bhp calculations, or not.
sorry for uploading a bugged version of the testers perf builder yesteday >.<
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Soutsen Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> p.s. and on a totally unrelated note, we had MPR
> received their 1st warning for inactivity of mr.
> Dan Paddock before the race at Sepang. Isn't it
> means they should have been fined with -10 points
> (I've read it from the rules)? Because looking
> at the official results page after Sepang I still
> see only the 9 points they have scored, and no
> penalty applied. It's time to inforce the law!
> ...maybe >.< ofc i'm not sure if this rule is
> still a thing anymore c:
Since the penalty wasn't given out before the performance file for the Malaysian Grand Prix (the activity check hadn't occured yet) I have chosen not to implement it in the standings as well. Since new standings are coming up tomorrow (yes, really!) this will be dealt with.
On a personal note considering the above penalty: if a team owner gets flagged in the activity check, does only the -10 WCC points occur or does the team owner, (in)active, also get the driver perf reduction?
... don't worry, I do not intend to leave without warning
If you are racing, keep on racing and get some points!
GPG Super League S11 | Driver #41 | Team-manager | Snake Motorsports Racing Group | Next Race: Emmeloord - Flevoland GP | Constructors: 10th | Best Race Finish: 1st
GPG Super League Season 9 Testers Champion*
-------------------------------------------------------
> p.s. and on a totally unrelated note, we had MPR
> received their 1st warning for inactivity of mr.
> Dan Paddock before the race at Sepang. Isn't it
> means they should have been fined with -10 points
> (I've read it from the rules
)? Because looking> at the official results page after Sepang I still
> see only the 9 points they have scored, and no
> penalty applied. It's time to inforce the law!
> ...maybe >.< ofc i'm not sure if this rule is
> still a thing anymore c:
Since the penalty wasn't given out before the performance file for the Malaysian Grand Prix (the activity check hadn't occured yet) I have chosen not to implement it in the standings as well. Since new standings are coming up tomorrow (yes, really!) this will be dealt with.
On a personal note considering the above penalty: if a team owner gets flagged in the activity check, does only the -10 WCC points occur or does the team owner, (in)active, also get the driver perf reduction?
... don't worry, I do not intend to leave without warning
GPG Super League S11 | Driver #41 | Team-manager | Snake Motorsports Racing Group | Next Race: Emmeloord - Flevoland GP | Constructors: 10th | Best Race Finish: 1st
GPG Super League Season 9 Testers Champion*
Soutsen Schreef:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again, little info about how boosting works
> so far this season:
> [imgdepo.com]
> .com/id/10794297.jpg
> For now it seems that boost works very well indeed
> (or maybe even too well - it can be a subject for
> discussion, if you like), considering that
> both Scala and Pedersen had additional pit stops,
> which caused them being out of points, and Jalving
> and Thomas were 5th and 6th at the time they
> collided. Right now it seems like using a boost
> leaves almost no chance for no-boosters. I say
> "almost" because after all drivers have made their
> stop we had Sanvitale and Nell quite far ahead of
> Cremasco, and they could finish ahead of him in
> theory... but in fact they both suffered from
> mechanical problems. Analyzing best laps, it
> showes again that the boosted cars were quickiest.
> Sanvitale, Milos and Rodriguez were the first
> pit-comers (all of them went in on lap 10th), so
> from the start they had less fuel on board, and
> their stint before the pit was basically a sprint.
> I suspect that this is why their best laps were
> better than ones by Scala, Worseling and Cremasco.
> But as Daly McClure's exaple showed us in
> Melbourne - early entry works quite bad for some
> reason. Carlos kind of proved it here once again,
> and we'll never know how it would've ended for
> Alessandro and Milos, since they both had their
> race ruined by accidents.
>
> Anyway, it was a thrilling race to watch, with AMR
> battling for the podium, and Nick collecting a
> victory slipped away from Pedersen and Tobi. Big
> dissapointment for Charrel, MTP and Demon, but
> that's how the racing goes. It's fun to watch how
> the season builds up so far, especially the
> testers part, of course
Thanks mate! That looks very interesting, looks like the boosts work out!
Race starts: 141 | Points: 886 | Podiums: 35 | Race wins: 10
Follow me on: Twitter | Instagram | Facebook
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again, little info about how boosting works
> so far this season:
> [imgdepo.com]
> .com/id/10794297.jpg
> For now it seems that boost works very well indeed
> (or maybe even too well - it can be a subject for
> discussion, if you like
), considering that> both Scala and Pedersen had additional pit stops,
> which caused them being out of points, and Jalving
> and Thomas were 5th and 6th at the time they
> collided. Right now it seems like using a boost
> leaves almost no chance for no-boosters. I say
> "almost" because after all drivers have made their
> stop we had Sanvitale and Nell quite far ahead of
> Cremasco, and they could finish ahead of him in
> theory... but in fact they both suffered from
> mechanical problems. Analyzing best laps, it
> showes again that the boosted cars were quickiest.
> Sanvitale, Milos and Rodriguez were the first
> pit-comers (all of them went in on lap 10th), so
> from the start they had less fuel on board, and
> their stint before the pit was basically a sprint.
> I suspect that this is why their best laps were
> better than ones by Scala, Worseling and Cremasco.
> But as Daly McClure's exaple showed us in
> Melbourne - early entry works quite bad for some
> reason. Carlos kind of proved it here once again,
> and we'll never know how it would've ended for
> Alessandro and Milos, since they both had their
> race ruined by accidents.
>
> Anyway, it was a thrilling race to watch, with AMR
> battling for the podium, and Nick collecting a
> victory slipped away from Pedersen and Tobi. Big
> dissapointment for Charrel, MTP and Demon, but
> that's how the racing goes. It's fun to watch how
> the season builds up so far, especially the
> testers part, of course
Thanks mate! That looks very interesting, looks like the boosts work out!
Race starts: 141 | Points: 886 | Podiums: 35 | Race wins: 10
Follow me on: Twitter | Instagram | Facebook
Round 3 - Japanese GP - Official Standings Tables
Round 3 - Japanese GP - Official Boost Tables
The secret agreement between me and Ed Greenhalgh worked well so far, we're swapping our helmets before every race and nobody noticed yet that is me actually driving for Team Alpha while he's working for John
/Plot twist/
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
/Plot twist/
___________________________________________________________________________
For a list of EVERY download for GP4, look here:[docs.google.com]
Brett Sinclair Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm only a driver, I don't do maths or perf
> calculations...
>
> ... let's go to Monza, plsssss !
And I'm team owner and say: let's go to Monza, please!!
BTW, Monza will be next race here and on GPGSL-3, too!!
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm only a driver, I don't do maths or perf
> calculations...
>
> ... let's go to Monza, plsssss !
And I'm team owner and say: let's go to Monza, please!!
BTW, Monza will be next race here and on GPGSL-3, too!!
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
BTW, two team slots on GPGSL-3 (on this season, without drivers change), but if someone wants to join there...
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
Very exciting to see Alpha on top of the WDC so soon into our rebirth!
Soutsen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The secret agreement between me and Ed Greenhalgh
> worked well so far, we're swapping our helmets
> before every race and nobody noticed yet that is
> me actually driving for Team Alpha while he's
> working for John
> /Plot twist/
X (@ed24f1)
Soutsen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The secret agreement between me and Ed Greenhalgh
> worked well so far, we're swapping our helmets
> before every race and nobody noticed yet that is
> me actually driving for Team Alpha while he's
> working for John
> /Plot twist/
X (@ed24f1)
Quote
Sneaking up to the top
Go you.
[www.mediafire.com] Some say you should click it, you know you want to.
[www.gp4central.com] <----GP4 Central
That's a Monza overdose!! Either in GPGSL3 and GPGSL!!
GPGSL-3: Fox race driver and team manager - 2011-2012 Constructor Champion - 2012 Driver Champion
Season 9 - #18 Erick Von Draxeler - #35 Marcus Bongardt
GPGSL-3: Fox race driver and team manager - 2011-2012 Constructor Champion - 2012 Driver Champion
Season 9 - #18 Erick Von Draxeler - #35 Marcus Bongardt
So anxious, hope our drivers can get a good result!! 
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/01/2017 06:25PM by Rod_vs.
One Racing driver and team manager
GPGSL-3: champion in 2007/2013/2014!
GPGSL-4: testdrivers champion in Season 11!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/01/2017 06:25PM by Rod_vs.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.