97kirkc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> chet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 97kirkc Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Where did you read its had a day in a real
> wind
> > > tunnel?
> >
> >
> > Heard of a lecturer still involved in
> aerodynamic
> > consultancy. I guess simple validation/mapping
> > runs. I cant imagine completing alot of work in
> a
> > single day.
>
> That's interesting, when Nick Wirth was asked if
> it had on the launch day he said no. He did
> accidentally state that it had used a wind tunnel
> in a speech shortly before when he meant virtual
> wind tunnel and quickly corrected himself in a
> statement afterwards.
I thought even the VR-01 had a single day. I suppose when they say 100% designed, then they are not wrong. They are just performing validation runs. Though it was a secondary source (i guess thats the right term!), he heard through someone else.
edit - the chef? was this done through flotation?
GPG should invest :p
edit 2 - this was on atlasf1 in the williams thread, no source given though.
"We have a new diffuser, new front wing, new brake ducts, new bargeboards and new bodywork," said Michael. "The only thing that is not changing at the moment is the rear wing."
I suppose the other teams will have similar updates but it sounds even better from williams :p! i really really hope the car is as good as we think! I hate the idea of drivers developing cars, Istill dont believe a driver can make a difference, at least not these days without tailored made bridgestone. But if the Williams is quick then how much credit will be due for Rubens?
"Trulli was slowing down like he wanted to have a picnic" LOL
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/25/2011 07:13PM by chet.