The Official 2017 Formula One Season *Bahrain Results*

Got to say, I like it! The blue reminds me of the Prost a bit.

---

Some mods
F1 1996 | F1 2002 | F1 2007 | F1 2011 | F1 2013 | F1 2015 | F1 2018

<3







Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/26/2017 06:45PM by IWE.

Now that IS a nice car!
Beautiful, why can't they all look so nice? Ban foreheads!

===================================================================================
Tahitian GP Circuit
[www.grandprixgames.org]
Easter Island Circuit
[www.grandprixgames.org]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/26/2017 07:01PM by salvasirignano.

Even with a thumb nose (which don't bother me to be fair) that would look gorgeous. Harks back to the metallic blue of the later Prost cars.

So far I like (in order, best first): Renault, Toro Rosso, Sauber
Middling: Ferrari, Red Bull, Mercedes (it looks too bloody long), Williams (it was lovely in 2014, but it's starting to need slightly bigger Martini lines)
Bringing up the rear: McLaren (looks far better on track than it did at launch, but still below what it should have been), Haas (it's only not last because of the clever fin livery), Force India.

It's refreshing to see some substantial livery changes for once... McLaren, Renault and Toro Roso all looking refreshed.

Breaking News!

If somebody is missing a vacuum cleaner, go look at Red Bull's factory!


GPGSL : Team Owner of 'Maverick Track Performance' (MTP)

I don't get it.

If you've lost your Flymo, have a look in Woking.

Big Bull in studio shots:





Cant wait for rumored "camo-livery" for testing..

Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?

The Toro Rosso looks slightly too dark on track today in my opinion but in general I'd have to say it's the best livery of 2017.

---

X (@ed24f1)

Can someone explain why the cars are so high off the ground this year? They look ridiculous.

Quote
Laton
Can someone explain why the cars are so high off the ground this year? They look ridiculous.

They're not really, it's the extreme rake that most teams are running this year, so it looks like the rear is miles in the air, but the front of the tea tray will be skimming the road ahead of it.

Laton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can someone explain why the cars are so high off
> the ground this year? They look ridiculous.

On high speed they are anyway scraping the ground.



Kimi, so, Massa Fernando Sebastian is faster than you. Can you confirm you understood that message?

Just wondering if DRS is still part of the car's features? It's hard to see in the photos I've seen of the cars.

---

And another Honda PU change. In 1 and a half days of running this will be their third.

Mercedes has also broken down in the back of the Force India (though could potentially be related to the modified exhaust they were using today?).

If that double T-wing looks better than the shark fins, I don't know. I had such a thing on top of my old black and white TV set.

---

REHAB IS FOR QUITTERS

Soon...





Stats: 139 Starts / 7 Wins / 9 Poles / 5 Fastest laps

Why a pic of the 1995 Mclaren?

---

Maybe because of the extra wing on the shark fin.

---

REHAB IS FOR QUITTERS

I got lost in trying to work out who it was in the McLaren... I'd completely forgot about Magnussen's debut at TI Aida.

gav Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Can someone explain why the cars are so high off
> the ground this year? They look ridiculous.
>
>
> They're not really, it's the extreme rake that
> most teams are running this year, so it looks like
> the rear is miles in the air, but the front of the
> tea tray will be skimming the road ahead of it.

Just to allow for suspension movement then? I don't understand the science behind why that would be beneficial