Excalibur Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>But Lotus solution is
> very ingenious, in order to get an overall
> aerodynamical effect with a little bit more
> obstruction which is transformed in a better
> airflow under the nose and chassis, using the
> tusks as vanes.To stay into the legality, this is
> the longer and bigger tusk (the right one) which
> is considered as being part of the main structure.
> the second one is just a part of the nose. This is
> the tip of the longer tusk which is considered as
> the nose tip of the car. So, this solution is
> legal and doesn't break the rules. In reality,
> this is not a double nose but a nose and an
> "appendice". This is why the nose is bigger than
> the sructural part, and also renforced for the
> crash tests
Thanks Excalibur that was very informative & interesting
Did not know that